TRADEMARK OPPOSITION IN VIETNAM: TIMELINE, PROCEDURES, AND LEGAL STRATEGIES FOR BUSINESSES

21/04/2026
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Under Vietnam’s first-to-file system, it is increasingly common for third parties to file trademark applications that are identical or confusingly similar to existing brands.

In this context, trademark opposition has become a critical legal mechanism that allows businesses to protect their rights at an early stage—before a trademark is granted protection.

In this article, A.D.V.N Law Firm provides a clear and practical overview of:

  • The statutory opposition timeline
  • The distinction between opposition and third-party observations
  • The procedures and practical considerations for filing an opposition in Vietnam

TRADEMARK OPPOSITION IN VIETNAM: TIMELINE, PROCEDURES, AND LEGAL STRATEGIES FOR BUSINESSES

Legal Basis and Competent Authority

Trademark opposition in Vietnam is governed by:

  • The Law on Intellectual Property (as amended in 2022)
  • Relevant implementing regulations and circulars

The competent authority is:
National Office of Intellectual Property of Vietnam


What is Trademark Opposition?

Under current regulations, from the date a trademark application is published in the Industrial Property Gazette until before a decision on grant is issued:

Any third party has the right to file an opposition against the registration of that trademark.

Such opposition must:

  • Be submitted in writing
  • Be supported by evidence and/or legal arguments

Key development:
Trademark opposition is now recognized as a formal and independent legal procedure, and the authority is obliged to examine and resolve it


Trademark Opposition Deadline in Vietnam

The opposition timeline is strictly regulated:

05 months from the publication date of the trademark application

After this deadline:

  • The authority will not accept formal opposition filings
  • Third parties may only submit informal observations, which carry limited legal weight

Practical takeaway:
Missing the deadline means losing the right to formally oppose


Opposition vs. Third-Party Observations

Criteria

Third-Party Observations

Trademark Opposition

Official fee

Not required

Required

Deadline

Anytime before grant

05 months from publication

Legal nature

Informational

Formal legal procedure

Authority obligation

Not mandatory

Must be examined

In practice:
Opposition is significantly more effective and enforceable


Required Documents for Opposition

A complete opposition dossier typically includes:

  • Opposition petition (identifying the opposed application)
  • Legal grounds and arguments
  • Supporting evidence (prior marks, proof of use, etc.)
  • Power of Attorney (if filed via representative)

Notes:

  • Official fees must be paid
  • Strong legal reasoning significantly increases success rate


Opposition Procedure Before IPOVN

The opposition process generally involves the following steps:

Step 1 – Formality Check and Notification

  • IPOVN reviews the opposition for formal compliance
  • The applicant is notified and given 02 months to respond


Step 2 – Exchange of Arguments

  • The applicant submits a response
  • The opponent may provide further comments


Step 3 – Hearing (if necessary)

  • IPOVN may organize a direct hearing between the parties


Step 4 – Decision

  • The opposition is resolved together with the substantive examination outcome


Step 5 – Follow-up Actions

  • If no response is filed → opposition may be deemed withdrawn
  • Complex disputes may be referred to court proceedings


Practical Insights from Legal Practice

Based on our experience, successful opposition cases often depend on:

Early monitoring and timely action

Strong legal arguments

Solid supporting evidence (especially proof of use)

Common mistakes:

  • Failure to monitor published applications
  • Filing after the deadline
  • Weak or unsupported arguments


When Should You File an Opposition?

Businesses should consider opposition where:

  • The applied mark is identical or confusingly similar
  • There are signs of bad-faith filings
  • The application conflicts with prior rights (trademarks, trade names, etc.)


Conclusion

Trademark opposition is a powerful preventive legal tool that allows rights holders to challenge conflicting applications before protection is granted.

However, given the strict deadline and procedural requirements, businesses must:

  • Monitor trademark publications regularly
  • Act promptly within the statutory period
  • Prepare well-supported legal arguments


Legal Services by A.D.V.N Law Firm

A.D.V.N Law Firm provides comprehensive support in trademark opposition matters, including:

  • Monitoring and identifying conflicting applications
  • Assessing opposition feasibility
  • Preparing legal arguments and evidence
  • Representing clients before IPOVN
  • Handling related disputes and enforcement

We ensure a strategic, efficient, and results-driven approach to protecting your brand.

SHARE